Paolini's "sneak peak" at Eldest from a letter he sent out to book stores when Eldest was released.
For those of you who want a sneak preview of ELDEST, I'll say this:
Two die, one is reborn, and one is renamed.
Flowers sing, birds speak, and ants wage war.
And a hammer sails through the eye of a boar.
A sword, a dragon, a half-answered riddle.
A scar, a blood oath, a celebration.
He who was broken must be made whole,
Before blood may meet blood in the field of battle.
From here.
Sounds like a fan brat's attempt at writing a prophecy.
For those of you who want a sneak preview of ELDEST, I'll say this:
Two die, one is reborn, and one is renamed.
Flowers sing, birds speak, and ants wage war.
And a hammer sails through the eye of a boar.
A sword, a dragon, a half-answered riddle.
A scar, a blood oath, a celebration.
He who was broken must be made whole,
Before blood may meet blood in the field of battle.
From here.
Sounds like a fan brat's attempt at writing a prophecy.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 10:07 pm (UTC)Dear Mr. Paolini,
You're ridiculous.
Regards,
_youngblood_
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:10 pm (UTC)Dear Chris (can I call you Chris? I only like to call good writers by a professional name.),
I think Eragon and Eldest are out of this world. And by that, I mean they should be forever removed out of this world. And that is not a sign to go into poetry either.
Without a whole lot of Love,
the7bells.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 02:41 am (UTC)"I think these books are the BOMB. And by that, I mean we should drop them all on terrorists and let the sheer idiocy of the story do the killing for us."
no subject
Date: 2007-02-18 12:00 am (UTC)Stupidity kills.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:08 pm (UTC)So here's a question:
Hypothetically speaking, you enter this contest and, by some stroke of luck, win.
You're standing there, face-to-face with Paolini. What would you do?
What would you do?
"Mister Paoweenie, your poem sucks." :)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:28 pm (UTC)I have a fair number of ideas, but I think most of them are illegal.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:49 pm (UTC)Having said that...can a creator be a BNF of themselves? Is Paolini his own BNF? And if he is...can I use my BNF hateing vitriol on him?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 12:02 am (UTC)That said, though, I don't think Paolini is particularly self-centred. Not a good writer, for sure, and rather oblivious, but I don't think he's so arrogant that he would assume the "OMG U JUZ DUN UNNERSTAND MY INTELEKSHUALISM" stance against non-fans or outright detractors.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 02:46 am (UTC)And I've seen first-hand accounts from people who say they were there when he visited their school, and they asked (or were present when he was asked) about the similarities between Eragon, Tolkien and Star Wars. His response, I understand, was generally "It's a homage, a tribute. Next question!"
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 01:59 am (UTC)Usagi Kou, Cassie Claire...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 04:15 am (UTC)Actually, I'd pay a lot to be able to see his reaction to your critiques...and your Meat stories.
But...it's be a scene not even money could buy.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:27 pm (UTC)I don't think I can say anything else. Is that travesty even supposed to rhyme? If it's meant to be free verse, it's bad even for most free verse. If it's meant to be prose, then the masters would be rolling in their graves.
Jeesh. I wrote bad poems when I was eleven, but at least they had rhythm and rhyming structure. And he was nineteen or twenty at the time of writing Eldest, wasn't he?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-17 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-18 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-18 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-23 03:47 pm (UTC)I imagine that's not what really happens. :P Though it's about as logical as anything that's gone before... >.>