Eragon pt. two
Jan. 13th, 2007 07:31 pmChapters" Discovery
Characters Eragon, our hero
Summary.
Discovery introduces us to our Hero of the story, Eragon. Eragon is a mighty hunter and brave and intelligent man, as this chapter will show us. Or at least this scene will show us. It's not really a chapter so much as a scene, but yes.
First of all we learn that Eargon is merely fifteen years old but already a trained and capable hunter who is not afraid to go into places that grown men dare. Because, as we learn in the next chapter, he's just that good. Or he's too stupid to be afraid. One of the two.
Meanwhile, Eargon is able to preform feats of skill that not even a master archer is able to. He's able to draw three arrows, knock one and keep the other two in his other hand. To quote, "At the glen, he strung his bow with a sure touch, then drew three arrows and knocked one, holding the others in his left hand." (page seven). To knock an arrow you need two hands. Apparently he is able to do this and still hold two other arrows at the same time. Perhaps, instead he has three hands?
Then he discovers the stone. We assume it is the same stone that the elf lost in the prologue because this is a traditional story device. And it wouldn't do the stone to fall into someone who is not the Hero's hands, now would it? The stone appeared in an explosion, which would indicate that it is hot, but after poking it with an arrow he picks it up with his bare hands. Because the poked with arrow test automatically makes it safe to pick up from a steaming hole.
The stone is "Cool and frictionless under his fingers, like harden silk," (page seven) which leads to a very interesting question. If it is frictionless, how did he pick it up? The definition of being frictionless means that you can't get a grip on it to pick it up. But somehow Eragon was able to.
As a closing to the chapter we get an insight into how Eragon thinks. He's just discovered a potentially dangerous magical object so what does he decided to do? Keep it and sell it for meat. Yes. This is what I would do with a potentially dangerous magical object. Sell it. Because God only knows what might happen to those poor people I've sold it to, if it turns out to be evil and horrible. Nope. I'm not going to do something intelligent with it like put it somewhere safe and find someone who might know what it is. I'm going to sell it.
Yes. Real genius there.
Characters Eragon, our hero
Summary.
Discovery introduces us to our Hero of the story, Eragon. Eragon is a mighty hunter and brave and intelligent man, as this chapter will show us. Or at least this scene will show us. It's not really a chapter so much as a scene, but yes.
First of all we learn that Eargon is merely fifteen years old but already a trained and capable hunter who is not afraid to go into places that grown men dare. Because, as we learn in the next chapter, he's just that good. Or he's too stupid to be afraid. One of the two.
Meanwhile, Eargon is able to preform feats of skill that not even a master archer is able to. He's able to draw three arrows, knock one and keep the other two in his other hand. To quote, "At the glen, he strung his bow with a sure touch, then drew three arrows and knocked one, holding the others in his left hand." (page seven). To knock an arrow you need two hands. Apparently he is able to do this and still hold two other arrows at the same time. Perhaps, instead he has three hands?
Then he discovers the stone. We assume it is the same stone that the elf lost in the prologue because this is a traditional story device. And it wouldn't do the stone to fall into someone who is not the Hero's hands, now would it? The stone appeared in an explosion, which would indicate that it is hot, but after poking it with an arrow he picks it up with his bare hands. Because the poked with arrow test automatically makes it safe to pick up from a steaming hole.
The stone is "Cool and frictionless under his fingers, like harden silk," (page seven) which leads to a very interesting question. If it is frictionless, how did he pick it up? The definition of being frictionless means that you can't get a grip on it to pick it up. But somehow Eragon was able to.
As a closing to the chapter we get an insight into how Eragon thinks. He's just discovered a potentially dangerous magical object so what does he decided to do? Keep it and sell it for meat. Yes. This is what I would do with a potentially dangerous magical object. Sell it. Because God only knows what might happen to those poor people I've sold it to, if it turns out to be evil and horrible. Nope. I'm not going to do something intelligent with it like put it somewhere safe and find someone who might know what it is. I'm going to sell it.
Yes. Real genius there.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 04:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 04:40 am (UTC)For fun.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 06:35 am (UTC)ps. friended you about eragon thing, hope you don't mind.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 09:13 am (UTC)As someone who has survived both books...I LOVE YOU. Keep going and help me reclaim my sanity!
(I always thought it was kind of kooky that he was such a 1337 hunter, btw.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 04:24 am (UTC)(It's the three arms)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-14 02:34 pm (UTC)Er, and if he's shooting righty, as I suspect, HE WOULD BE HOLDING THE FREAKING BOW IN HIS LEFT HAND!!!!!! *splutter* There is no room for arrows and a bow in one hand! If it were possible, we wouldn't need quivers! He could possibly hold it in his right if he wanted to stab himself when he drew back. Take anatomy lessons and basic archery knowledge before writing Paolini kthnxdie.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 04:26 am (UTC)Yes... you're right. Hence my third arm theory.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 01:40 am (UTC)Especially that bit about the arrows. I can't believe all the stuff I missed; I thought the book was bad when I read it, but you're putting it in a whole new light of craptrasticalness. Wow. Thank you. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 04:29 am (UTC)All I've been doing is looking at the words as an analysis and not as a reader. It's a different sort of mind set. Kind of the same sort you use when Sporking.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 04:37 am (UTC)Bwahahaha!
Date: 2007-01-15 05:00 pm (UTC)I'm also here from deleterius. I haven't read the book, but I've certainly heard enough about it (and that awful "We fight as one!!1!!" movie it's spawned) to find lots of amusement in your analysis of it.
Re: Bwahahaha!
Date: 2007-01-15 10:08 pm (UTC)What I heard about the book made me curious to go and see what the whoopla was about. It's better than advertised.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 05:40 pm (UTC)Arrow: Knock knock
Eragon: Who's there?
Paolini's little war against good fantasy irks me greatly. I've friended you to keep track of the sporking, if you don't mind.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-15 10:09 pm (UTC)No worries! Friend away! Join in the fight against bad fantasy!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-18 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 06:16 am (UTC)On a actual defense, I bet three out of four people would sell a meterorite -like object they found. Of course, those three out of four people aren't heroes or capable of saving pretty much anything, but that's beside the poit!
Regardless, I find your efforts amusing as they were no doubt intended.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 06:24 am (UTC)Maybe he's getting rid of it BECAUSE it's potentially dangerous and he actually wants to save his own hide by getting rid of it while simultaneously profitting?
Even better that he apparently tries to get it to the guy he doesn't like (or at least doesn't like him).
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 06:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 06:35 am (UTC)Although, I suppose you're right in that if he's attempting cunning it would work better if the author was more explicit.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 11:34 am (UTC)Well, nobody said the boy was supposed to be heroic. Except for the fact that his name is on the cover. *cough*