Meme and short essay
Jun. 18th, 2007 12:21 pm1. Grab the nearest book.
2. Open the book to page 23.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the text of the next three sentences in your journal along with these instructions.
5. Don't dig for your favorite book, the cool book, or the intellectual one: pick the CLOSEST.
As a species, humans are physically, culturally, and politically diverse. Hardy or fine, light-skined or dark, humans remain one of the most dominant species through out all eras of play. Personality: Human personality runs the gamut of possibilities, though members of this species tend to be highly adaptable, tenacious, and willing to keep striving no matter the odds.
~Star Wars, Saga Edition, RPG manual.
On a side note, since this is what came up. I've read a lot of RPG manuals and in regards to humans they always say that they're very adaptable and diverse etc. Other species, every individual is all the same. They're all "calm, peaceful, tranquil and gentle" (Ithorians) or "Violent, tenacious and dedicated" (Rodains) which doesn't make any sense, since when is an entire race of millions or billions of people definable in three words?
And now that I think about it why do all non-human races have only one society, one culture, one way of doing things? All the Klingons are a warrior race bent on Honor. All Vulcans embrace logic. There's an entire planet of these people and they're all the same. They don't have different countries or religions. They're all one society. And those that do happen to have different beliefs are heretics or rebels or different from the norm.
I suppose it's because it's rather difficult to come up with one alien culture, much less five or six. But at least they could be indicated, or hinted at even if they aren't shown.
I now must do this for my own races.
Bugger.
2. Open the book to page 23.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the text of the next three sentences in your journal along with these instructions.
5. Don't dig for your favorite book, the cool book, or the intellectual one: pick the CLOSEST.
As a species, humans are physically, culturally, and politically diverse. Hardy or fine, light-skined or dark, humans remain one of the most dominant species through out all eras of play. Personality: Human personality runs the gamut of possibilities, though members of this species tend to be highly adaptable, tenacious, and willing to keep striving no matter the odds.
~Star Wars, Saga Edition, RPG manual.
On a side note, since this is what came up. I've read a lot of RPG manuals and in regards to humans they always say that they're very adaptable and diverse etc. Other species, every individual is all the same. They're all "calm, peaceful, tranquil and gentle" (Ithorians) or "Violent, tenacious and dedicated" (Rodains) which doesn't make any sense, since when is an entire race of millions or billions of people definable in three words?
And now that I think about it why do all non-human races have only one society, one culture, one way of doing things? All the Klingons are a warrior race bent on Honor. All Vulcans embrace logic. There's an entire planet of these people and they're all the same. They don't have different countries or religions. They're all one society. And those that do happen to have different beliefs are heretics or rebels or different from the norm.
I suppose it's because it's rather difficult to come up with one alien culture, much less five or six. But at least they could be indicated, or hinted at even if they aren't shown.
I now must do this for my own races.
Bugger.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:24 pm (UTC)I was explaining one of my Star Wars
SuesOC's to a friend who's a Star Wars nut.My OC was a cybernetic Twi'lek, and she said something along the lines of "They'd rather die than becomes cold and mechanical" and I said "Well,surely not ALL Twi'leks are like that. They can't be. I'm sure not all Toydarians only care about money, like Watto."
her response? "Diversity? In Star Wars?"
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:34 pm (UTC)I certainly don't see why there can't be diversity in Star Wars even if it wasn't shown.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:29 pm (UTC)It's probably easier to write humans, since that's the area best known to them.
For a moment I thought the quote came of the D&D Player's Handbook.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:35 pm (UTC)For a moment I thought the quote came of the D&D Player's Handbook.
I think it's practically the same from the D&D players handbook. After all it's made by the same people.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:37 pm (UTC)And for that matter, why, in most sci-fi, are species almost always in the same political unit? Nations and races have little correlation on Earth. Sure, some nations are largely homogenous (like Japan or Iceland), but many nations are multiracial, and all races are scattered about different nations. While Japan may be over 90% ethnic Japanese, ethnic Japanese are scattered all about the Earth. Why can't there be Klingon immigrants in the Federation? Or, vice versa, human emmigrants in the Klingon Empire? (Perhaps even with problems similar to those of the Japanese-Americans in WWII) Why is every planet unified before they develop space travel? It would be more logical to suppose a situation analogous to the European settlement of America. There would be, for example, US space colonies, Russian space colonies, EU space colonies, and so on.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:54 pm (UTC)But it seems like most Science Fiction aliens are like that.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:50 pm (UTC)*hopes she remembered right about ADF, knows she's right about Flint*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 11:35 pm (UTC)I will now fangirl.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 04:07 pm (UTC)Not really. I mean, they've got the honour thing down, sure, but I don't really recall much about samurai quaffing from huge kegs of strong liquor, engaging in wild parties and possessing table manners that would make a starving hobo look refined. They're really much more Viking-like than samurai, honour or no.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:47 pm (UTC)Returning to Arlia Village, you give the stranger a tour of the sites there, introducing him to the various people going about their daily routines.
~Star Ocean: The Second Story, Prima's Official Strategy Guide
no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-18 10:09 pm (UTC)I should report this now
Would they believe me?
-The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (The Tempest)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 08:00 am (UTC)'Listen,' he said reassuringly, 'your case is strong. Verres is obviously corrupt. [...]'
~ Imperium, Robert Harris
What about different countries? In the present world, we have stereotypes of people based on their countries. Would similar country stereotypes exist if the countries were composed of human and nonhuman species? Most cultures develop depending on the land; would this be quite as true if it was a mix of species populating it?
Sorry if this post sounds too...too anything, really. They're just questions that arise for me when someone brings up interspecies culture. :]
no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 10:22 am (UTC)Renwick gathered up his robes and took the stairs two at a time."
I've already started looking at how different cultures might develop in different species, but I'm not sure how to go about it or how far to go. The only time I've ever seen multiple cultures in a single fantasy racial group has been D&D, like the multitude of elf types in Forgotten Realms. Raymond E Feist has multiple elf types too, as I recall... and in D&D, a different culture is treated as more of a racial subgroup. Drow are physically and mentally different from moon elves, not just socially. But then, once you start dividing a race into cultures, where does it stop? What if you just keep finding possible divergences?
And why can't I come up with a set of dwarves and elves that do NOT have completley opposite values???
Another question... by and large, humans developed different cultures due in part to the different niches and environments they inhabit, right? An abundance of ores make a machine-using culture more likely, a more savage land begets a more barbaric and simplistic lifestyle, and so on. So... what if there are already other races filling those niches? Would humanity divide up as much?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 10:25 am (UTC)"If he hurried, he'd have just enough time to reassemble Nimra's babies before their grandsire arrived."
no subject
Date: 2007-06-19 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 08:41 pm (UTC)Nearest book to hand that is not my Latin dictionary is Return of the King. "'It has been guessed here already,' said Ingold; 'for there have been strange portents here of late. But pass on now quickly! For the Lord of Minas Tirith will be eager to see any that bear the latest tidings of his son, be he man or—'"
Note that this does not mean I have read Return of the King. It just means that I keep the book close to my usual seat in the apartment as a reminder that I really ought to read it.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-27 08:45 pm (UTC)