kippurbird: (meat!)
[personal profile] kippurbird
Chapters Why do you fight? Black Morning Glory


Summary

We get some meat in these chapters. But not in my sense, but in story sense.

Eragon wakes up to Yoda's alarm clock. He's very sore. He goes about his ablutions but that's not our Thesaurus Raped word of the day. He goes to Yoda who asks him what Saphira learned and he answers. And then Yoda notices that Eragon isn't up to par.

"As the dragons departed, Oromis observed, "Your voice is rougher today, Eragon. Are you sick?"

"My back hurt again this morning."

"Ah. You have my sympathy." (341)


And then they go train. Yoda uses some lovely high language to describe the fact that they're going to spar, "Cross our blades" he says. They spar, or cross their blades, and Eragon is outclassed. Twenty minutes into the fight Yoda starts looking sick. Eragon tries to take advantage of this and his back starts to spazz and he collapses again. This time he doesn't faint, he's conscious through the entire time. I still call faint and that's five times. When he recovers he's upset about the fact that his tunic is all messed up.

Saphira expresses her concern for him and he snips at her and tells her to leave him alone.

Yoda is very bland about this. Asks him if he needs healing. Eragon says no. Yoda says, okay go meditate about ants. The amount of concern that Yoda exhibits for Eragon's well being is amazing. Eragon has a serious issues with his back. This should be looked at. If Yoda is truly wanting Eragon to become a wonderful dragon rider, he should be examining Eragon's back with his magical skills and not sending Eragon off to watch the ants. After all he's fainted five times from this problem. And fainting isn't really something you want in your chosen hero. Especially in battle.

Instead Eragon contemplates Ants. He's amazed. I begin to think that Paolini has an ant fetish.

Then he goes back to Yoda and describes what he witnessed. Yoda says that he's learning and they have lunch. It's vegetable stew. Eragon really wants some meat. Something he could sink his teeth into. Instead of asking for some meat, he asks why he's being made to meditate. He wants to know if there's more to it than understanding the doings of the animals and insects.

Yoda tells Eragon that he's not using his brain and that it's a human failing. That they don't use their brains unlike Elves. He then starts talking with Eragon about the potential dangers that he'll face, mainly from other magic users. And he basically tells Eragon that he has to be conscious of people all the time. Basically he needs to be reading people's minds all the time. Their privacy is less of an issue than not dying. And apparently Riders weren't taught to read everyone's mind until the Riders were sure they could resist the temptation not to do it. It's an invasion of privacy but you'll learn what drives people. I'm not sure if that's a fair exchange.

Then Yoda asks him what the most important mental tool that a person has. Eragon guesses determination and wisdom. Both wrong. It's Logic.

As he explains,

"History provides us with numerous examples of people who were convinced that they were doing the right thing and committed terrible crimes because of it. Keep in mind Eragon, that no one thinks of himself as a villain, and few make decisions they think are wrong. A person may dislike his choice, but he will stand by it because, even in the worst circumstances, he believes it to be the best option available to him at the time. (page 350)


This entire argument feels like it's coming from somewhere that Paolini has read before. After all, we've seen that he doesn't seem to follow it himself in his writing. Of course this could be argued that the people making decisions aren't thinking logically because they aren't trained to do it because they're simply human and don't know better. They aren't as enlightened as the elves who know this. Moving forward, Eragon is asked why does he fight the Empire.

"As I said before, to help those who suffer from Galbatorix's rule and, to a lesser extent, for personal vengeance."

"Then you fight for humanitarian reasons?"

"What do you mean?"

"That you fight to help the people who Galbatorix has harmed and to stop him from hurting any more."

"Exactly," said Eragon.

"Ah but answer me this, my young Rider: Won't your war with Galbatorix cause more pain that it will prevent? The majority of people in the Empire live normal, productive lives untouched by the king's madness. How can you justify invading their land, destroying their homes and kiling their sons and daughters?"

Eragon gaped, stunned that Oromis could ask such a question -Galbatorix was evil - and stunned because no easy reply presented itself. He knew he was in the right, but how could he prove it.


So, what basically just happened here is that Yoda told Eragon and us the readers that the king is doing a good job. Most people in the Empire are happy and healthy. The Empire is running, something that couldn't happen if the King was doing a bad person. Or insane. So, obviously it's Eragon who has the problem here, because he's so insistent that the King is Evil. Eragon is told to ponder this question and get a convincing reply.

They have more lessons, this time in writing. Yoda gives him some scrolls to read. Apparently the elves don't have books, but scrolls. In this instance they're behind the humans and their technology, for they're able to mass produce books. Yoda says that they're to help him learn things that he can't vocalize. Eragon wants to know what vocalize means. Eragon, in his point of view has been using words that I constantly have to look up in a dictionary to understand, but he doesn't understand what vocalize means. You do not use words in that you character wouldn't understand if you're writing in their point of view. Just because they're not actually thinking it or speaking it, doesn't mean that it's still not their thoughts. But I've discussed this before with Roran's POV. Yoda gives him the dictionary to read.

As Eragon is leaving, he wants to know when they're going to work on magic. Yoda agrees to teach him some now. Apparently, the rules of magic are even more confusing that we previously thought they were. Now we learn that it's not the words that you use, but the thoughts behind the word. So then theoretically it could be said that you could say, "fire" but be thinking "water" and do something with water, if that's the reasoning we're going with. So, I'm really not certain how the magic works anymore.

They play with water. Doing things with it. Eragon eventually gets bored and wants to say something but he is chary of offending Yoda. Chary is our Thesaurus raped word of the day. It means, of course, wary. It even sounds like it. In fact it conveys the same thing as chary, except that I wouldn't have had to go to the dictionary to double check to make sure I got the right meaning. There really was no need for that word to be there, unless Paolini wanted me to go Huh? while reading the book. He still says something, because he's bored.

So, Yoda binds him in water. Eragon tries a bit of magic that drains him of his energy. Apparently, according to Yoda, he did it wrong. You're not supposed to use a spell that has only two outcomes, successes or death. Instead you're supposed to make it a process that can be stopped when you want it too. They try again, but this time Yoda fails in his strength. Apparently its his sickness that's acting up.

Eragon feels sorry... or we're told that he feels sorry for Yoda. He bows to Yoda, putting his head against the ground. He feels no pain. Despite the fact that his back used to be killing him. He apologizes to Yoda and Yoda says nothing. So, he stays there until Saphira and Glaedr return.

Yoda tells him that they'll have their lessons again tomorrow and that he should, for practice, start talking only in the ancient language. He's also going to be fighting with another elf in the morning. Yoda reaffirms that Eragon is "as good a swordsman as he ever met" and that he only needs to maintain his current skill level and doesn't need to learn anything more. Let us be reminded that earlier Yoda was kicking Eragon's butt and Eragon didn't even get a hit on him. But apparently he doesn't need any more training and Yoda can't teach him any more. I'm beginning to think that Yoda wants Eragon to fail.

As they're about to leave, Saphira snaps at Glaedr's tail playfully. Eragon chides her on this and she tells him to stop being her conscience. Eragon finds this hilarious and almost falls off Saphira while they're flying. Pity he didn't. Anyway he tells her it's only fair that he be her conscience if she's his.

Arya shows up at the tree house and offers to take Eragon out to show him places. We learn that there are only two children in Ellesmera at the time. Apparently budding isn't that great of a process. They go and visit the place where the elves live. It's very pretty. There are great works of art which is apparently all right for the elves to have, but not for the dwarves to have because the dwarves take money away from hungry people and the elves... are hippies.

She shows him a morning glory and says that it's the most perfect and lovely flower. Eragon agrees with her and says that she is too. Saphira is shocked. Arya tells him that some other elf made it for her. Eragon feels embarrassed and in typical thinking about himself fashion is offended that she didn't like his compliments.

So, he leaves, with Saphira explaining to him why it would never work between the two of them. I think she's jealous of her and wants him all for herself.

Back at their tree house, Dwarf shows up again. Eragon admits to having forgotten about dwarf. Thus, once again, proving that he is a non-entity. They talk for a little bit, Dwarf complaining about the elves and the leaves and being drunk like. We do learn that he's engaged to be married. But it's Saphira who asks this, Eragon never thought to ask about his personal life. And that's another point on the disconnected from reality score. After all dwarf is supposed to be his good friend but he's never thought to learn anything about him. Dwarf is a non entity to him and exists only to be the token dwarf on the adventure.

However the best part of this,

Helping him upright, Eragon said, "I think you'd better stay here for the night. You're in no condition to go down those stairs in the dark."

Orik agreed with cheery indifference. He allowed Eragon to remove his mail and bundle him onto one side of the bed. Afterward Eragon sighed, covered the lights, and lay on his side of the mattress.

He fell asleep hearing the dwarf mutter, "...Hvedra...Hvedra...Hvedra..." (page 568)


Okay, apparently I was wrong. There is my kind of meat in this chapter. Also I would like to nominate "Keep in mind Eragon, that no one thinks of himself as a villain, and few make decisions they think are wrong." As the most ironic sentence in this book.

Date: 2007-04-17 09:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dryaunda.livejournal.com
This entire argument [that logic is the most important mental tool that a person has] feels like it's coming from somewhere that Paolini has read before. After all, we've seen that he doesn't seem to follow it himself in his writing.

Logic involves looking for answers, which you won't do if you believe you know it all.

Date: 2007-04-17 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
This is true. And even when Eragon is looking for answers he just goes with whatever someone tells him to be true.

Date: 2007-04-17 09:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] christinaathena.livejournal.com
So, what basically just happened here is that Yoda told Eragon and us the readers that the king is doing a good job. Most people in the Empire are happy and healthy.

Now, unless it turns out that Galby's massaccaring some ethnic minority or something, that's pretty amusing. Yet again, Pao-Pao's made his hero a sociopath ...

Now we learn that it's not the words that you use, but the thoughts behind the word. So then theoretically it could be said that you could say, "fire" but be thinking "water" and do something with water, if that's the reasoning we're going with. So, I'm really not certain how the magic works anymore. ... so then why the heck is there a special language for magic? Couldn't you just say Gaba ooga daba and just think what you wanted to happen?

We learn that there are only two children in Ellesmera at the time. Apparently budding isn't that great of a process. Actually, if they're virtually immortal, and assuming their childhood lasts a similar length of time as ours, that's pretty reasonable. Otherwise, you'd have an exploding population. One of the few things that does make sense.

I would like to nominate "Keep in mind Eragon, that no one thinks of himself as a villain, and few make decisions they think are wrong." As the most ironic sentence in this book.

Seconded. :-)

Date: 2007-04-17 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
Now, unless it turns out that Galby's massaccaring some ethnic minority or something, that's pretty amusing. Yet again, Pao-Pao's made his hero a sociopath ...

Eragon is right because Galby is evil. And that's all the reasoning you need.

Actually, if they're virtually immortal, and assuming their childhood lasts a similar length of time as ours, that's pretty reasonable. Otherwise, you'd have an exploding population. One of the few things that does make sense.

This is true. I was merely commenting on the fact that Paolini previously stated that his elves were unable to have children. At least that's what I meant to say.

Date: 2007-04-18 04:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] christinaathena.livejournal.com
Oh, right. I'd forgotten about that. I rather suspect it was a misused word myself, that he meant to say they weren't very fertile, having difficultly conveiving (sensible in a near-immortal race), but, yeah, the way he'd said it definitely implied a complete inability to have children. *nods*

Date: 2007-04-17 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] christinaathena.livejournal.com
Oh, and I love how Pao-Pao's idea of logic seems to actually be rationalization. Eragon KNOWS Galby is evil, the only question is how to PROVE it. Not a matter of seriously analyzing the issue, with a willingness to let go of his belief if it proves wrong.

Date: 2007-04-17 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] berseker.livejournal.com
That’s what I was going to say.

Plus, the logic course of action is not always the most humanitarian. Moral and ethics aren’t always logical, because everything will depend of how you see things.

Take Galby. The Varden were attacking his kingdom, right? So the logical thing for him to do is defend himself and attack back. But that makes him evil. And Rouran. He doesn´t know shit about war and defense tactic because he´s just a farmer, so the lgical thing would be let someone who actually knows what s/he´s doing take the lead. He doesn´t, and that makes him a hero. Seems to me that logic is not working.

Then again, they’re humans. They don’t have brains.

Date: 2007-04-17 06:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
You're right it IS rationalization. I totally missed that. HAH.

Date: 2007-04-17 10:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jacedraccus.livejournal.com
Logic?

Crap, he's Yoda in Spock's body.

Date: 2007-04-17 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dove-cg.livejournal.com
Or is it the other way around? Considering Vulcans look kind of elven... oh, hell. I dunno. XD

Date: 2007-04-17 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
That's what I was thinking. XD

Date: 2007-04-17 01:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] berseker.livejournal.com
How can you be cheery indifferent?

Maybe Eragon should let Arya check his back. Then, if she´s unable to cure him, she´ll kill him. ^^

Date: 2007-04-17 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dove-cg.livejournal.com
OMG. Best idea yet! I second that motion. :D

Date: 2007-04-18 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karma-kalisutah.livejournal.com
I agree! And third it.

Date: 2007-04-17 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
I would think that you're indifferent with a cheerful attitude. Like "Hah Hah, I don't care!!" or something.

Personally, I think Yoda is trying to kill Eragon.

Date: 2007-04-17 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dove-cg.livejournal.com
I would like to nominate "Keep in mind Eragon, that no one thinks of himself as a villain, and few make decisions they think are wrong." As the most ironic sentence in this book.

I also agree. XD

However, this is another reason to be careful about publishing essays before the green brick arrives. I believe one of the people who commented on Eragon said that Paolini had lifted the bits about logic from a text book on philosophy (I think... something like that. I don't think they meant he copied word for word but that was where he got the idea and probably the phrasing.)

Other than the other errors in the text, it is still plausible that Paolini intends to have Eragon turn out to be a villain... It's highly unlikely but given Yoda's comments? I'm more willing to consider the fact that Pao-Pao could fail at all the little details, that don't work towards that idea, but succeeded at intentionally making Eragon a sociopath. (Arya and Roran are just widdle failures or else linked to this notion thanks to their association with Eragon.)

It is also sad that the smartest person in the book, Oromis, can only reach such simple and reasonable conclusions by having his words taken from a text book on logic. (I also find it ironic, but not a bad detail, that Oromis has something he can't find the right words for and so has Eragon read something from his library to get the idea. Since that is probably the case with Paolini giving his text book, cough, I mean Oromis' actual words to Eragon.)

Eragon gaped, stunned that Oromis could ask such a question -Galbatorix was evil - and stunned because no easy reply presented itself. He knew he was in the right, but how could he prove it.

I do hope this line at least means that Galby will appear before the end of the green brick. Now Galby needs to do more broad scale evil things to prove to Eragon (and Roran) that he still needs to be taken down. ;P

Date: 2007-04-17 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] -youngblood-.livejournal.com
I would have so much more respect for Pao Pao if Eragon turned out to be a villain, but I doubt it will happen. Artistically, it may be really cool and totally awesome, but readers hate it when they feel they've been tricked. If it had been one book instead of a trilogy, he may have gotten away with making Eragon the villain, but if he goes that way with the trilogy, his readers will feel as if they've been maliciously duped; strung along for three books, trusting Pao Pao's word, only to find out that he's "lied" to them.

Like I said, it wouldn't be fair to Pao Pao, but that's what would happen. It would be effin' awesome, though.

Date: 2007-04-17 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] -youngblood-.livejournal.com
I meant "Artistically, it may be really cool and a totally awesome twist..." Sorry for the typo.

Date: 2007-04-17 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
Other than the other errors in the text, it is still plausible that Paolini intends to have Eragon turn out to be a villain... It's highly unlikely but given Yoda's comments? I'm more willing to consider the fact that Pao-Pao could fail at all the little details, that don't work towards that idea, but succeeded at intentionally making Eragon a sociopath. (Arya and Roran are just widdle failures or else linked to this notion thanks to their association with Eragon.)

The problem with this idea is that Paolini continually touts his book as an Archetypal hero's story. In those types of stories, the hero doesn't turn out to be the villain. He's been following the hero's journey like it's a check off list to write a story. It would be impossible for him to turn his hero into a villain because of this. Not only that but Eragon is Paolini's self admitted insert and he's not going to turn himself into a villain.

Eragon is constantly being treated as the hero. No one seems to disagree that he's the Savior, even Yoda.

If this had been any other writer who actually had experience writing, I would say that it was a distinct possibility. However given how the book is written and Paolini's statements in regards to the book, I would disagree with the idea that Eragon is going to turn out to be evil.

Date: 2007-04-17 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] spoofmaster
Seriously, after Yoda's little logic speech I'm really beginning to think that Eragon might be the villain, and on purpose. The problem is that Pao Pao has coninually claimed that this is a coming of age story or somesuch...*sigh*. I'll be downright impressed if he follows this through to its logical conclusion and has it turn out that Eragon's a psycho and Galby's in the right. The writing is bad for either conclusion, but at least then one could say that he was a little bit clever.

Date: 2007-04-17 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
No, as for reasons stated above, I don't believe that Eragon will turn out to be the villain.

Date: 2007-04-17 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cazrolime.livejournal.com
Clearly, Yoda's read your alternative ending. :D

Date: 2007-04-17 09:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
I certainly think so. I also think that Yoda is trying to get Eragon killed.

I so must write that now.

Date: 2007-04-17 08:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frodo-harry.livejournal.com
Your alternate ending is much more reasonable than anything Pao Pao writes. Poor Yoda, I liked him in Star wars. I would actually rather see it that Eragon turned out to be a villain, than remain the character that he is now.

On another note, I am currently writing a Lord Of The Rings/ Harry Potter crossover. I want to stay as close to canon as possible so that Tolkien will not have to roll in his grave. I want to try and avoid all the cliché’s that make out bad crossover fan fiction. I know that you are knowledgeable in the Lord of the Rings as well as in the Hp canon. Would you be able to beta for me, because can not seam to find possible beta who knows lotr and Hp? I understand if you are too busy, but maybe you know someone who could beta for my by any chance?

Frodo

Date: 2007-04-18 02:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karma-kalisutah.livejournal.com
I, for one, cannot wait to hear Eragon's supremely "logical" rationalization. That'll be good for a laugh.

Of course, it could be just as excellent if Paolini forgets about this little exchange all together and it never comes up again. After what happened with the infamous first line of the trilogy, I'd say that's a distinct possibility.

Date: 2007-04-18 05:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kippurbird.livejournal.com
You get to hear it in the next chapter actually. Hold on to your seats.

Date: 2007-04-18 08:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] reverie-shadow.livejournal.com
I am suddenly reminded of Goodkind a couple times in this chapter. First one being Yoda telling Eragon that "no one thinks he's evil" is similar to Zedd telling Richard the same thing in "Wizard's First Rule", when talking about perception. I also remember that whole rant dragging on for an entire chapter. Ugh.

The other thing being: "Just because they're not actually thinking it or speaking it, doesn't mean that it's still not their thoughts." That.

A lot of books will do this when writing in third person: When a story is being written from a young child's point of view, you can usually clearly tell. Goodkind did the same thing in "Wizard's First Rule" when he was writing the little girl, Rachel. You could easily distinguish that it's her telling the story, because you can tell that the narrator is writing from either a child's point of view, or a very uneducated person's perspective.

Eragon is not educated. He doesn't even know how to read or write. There is also no distinguished styles of story-telling when Paolini switches character's perspectives--they're all the same. I'm sure that if you flipped to a random page of the book, you wouldn't be able to tell which character is telling the story because there's no special method of story-telling he takes. It's all just there.

Granted, I still hate Goodkind, so those examples rather bug me. I'd rather use Chrisabella from the "Otherland" books as an example for using a child's point of view, or "A Kid's Story (a short story I read my sophomore year of high school), but I'm not sure if you've read those.

The ending of that chapter still creeps me out.

Date: 2007-04-20 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sonic-sues.livejournal.com
Eragon is not educated. He doesn't even know how to read or write.

Nuh-uh. In one chapter, Eragon learned to read in a week. Remember?

February 2016

S M T W T F S
 123456
7891011 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 10th, 2026 09:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios