Eragon pt. six
Jan. 19th, 2007 10:34 pmChapters A Miller-to-Be, Strangers in Carvahall
Characters Eragon, Garrow, Roran, Saphira, Hurst, Sloan, 2 Mysterious Strangers, Brom
Shiny Magical Objects in Eragon's Possession Saphira.
Summary
A Miller-To-Be is a very short chapter. In it's entire three pages we learn that Garrow is not, as Eragon would suppose that he would be, upset with Roran leaving to become a Miller, but instead happy for his son, because he's growing up into a nice fine young man who will soon be able to have a wife. Yay. Apparently there is supposed to be some sort of tension going on because of this. Garrow says, "It's life's natural course." And then Eragon and Roran helped him wash the dishes in silence. However, this is the sort of reaction one would assume to be having if Garrow was unhappy with Roran's decision to become a Miller. BUT Garrow is not upset. There's even a twinkle in his eye when he tells Roran that he's happy for him.
Only Eragon is unhappy for Roran. He stops talking to his uncle and cousin and then wonders why there is a distance between him and Roran. There's really nothing more I can say to that.
In the mean time Eragon and Saphira bond. Paolini tells us that Saphira's personality "was eclectic and at times completely alien, yet they understood each other on a profound level". These are all very pretty words, but what do they mean exactly? It's all very vague and there are no examples of this to make it clearer. But it does sound profound doesn't it? Using the word profound usually indicates that there is a profoundness. But better would have been to show and not tell us that they have a deep profound understanding. (Though how you would do that, is up in the air. But it's not something you should just say.)
Garrow, on the morn of Roran's leaving, gives Roran and Eragon some advice. It sounds like the Sunscreen song but less amusing. I believe it's supposed to be good advice, but it sounds trite. He says things like, "...Let no one rule your mind or body. Take special care that your thoughts remain unfettered. One may be a free man yet be bound tighter than a slave. Give men your ear, but not your heart. Show respect for those in power, but don't follow them blindly. Judge with logic and reason, but comment not." (page 64). Very... trite, but it sounds good and wise, doesn't it? I doubt that Eragon will follow it. But it sounds good.
In town Eragon learns that two strangers are looking for his stone. They are, of course, very bad news. Hurst tells him to leave town and get rid of the stone. Eragon, instead, eavesdrops on Sloan talking to the Mysterious Strangers. He decides that he's going to punch Sloan the next time he sees him, because Sloan tells them about the stone. We don't know what Sloan is feeling or even if he's the only one who's told them. The mysterious strangers are definitely threatening. Sloan has no loyalty to Eragon, but he may feel that these strangers are a danger to his daughter. Sloan has no reason to be loyal to Eragon, yet Eragon feels that he should be silent. Sloan has been slated to be the enemy since we first met him. And this is why he's the enemy. So he can betray Eragon to the enemy. It couldn't be a good person who does it by accident, or one that was coerced because then they wouldn't be good. We need a bad person to do a bad thing. In this case betray Eragon to the bad guys. It would be more tense and dramatic if these mysterious strangers were to threaten or get a good person to betray Eragon by accident. Or even if Sloan were to not betray Eragon. But since Sloan is the bad guy he has to be the one who betrays Eragon.
The Mysterious Strangers notice Eragon and he freezes up. This is supposed to be strange and mysterious but instead it could just be explained as being scared witless. Brom rescues him and mugs off his mit to see the silvery mark on his hand. How does Brom know which hand has the mark, we really don't know. But we know that he was looking for the mark because he asked about the trader that Eragon said told him about dragon things. And Brom of course knows a bit too much about dragons than an ordinary storyteller should. And this is Stranger and Mysterious.
Characters Eragon, Garrow, Roran, Saphira, Hurst, Sloan, 2 Mysterious Strangers, Brom
Shiny Magical Objects in Eragon's Possession Saphira.
Summary
A Miller-To-Be is a very short chapter. In it's entire three pages we learn that Garrow is not, as Eragon would suppose that he would be, upset with Roran leaving to become a Miller, but instead happy for his son, because he's growing up into a nice fine young man who will soon be able to have a wife. Yay. Apparently there is supposed to be some sort of tension going on because of this. Garrow says, "It's life's natural course." And then Eragon and Roran helped him wash the dishes in silence. However, this is the sort of reaction one would assume to be having if Garrow was unhappy with Roran's decision to become a Miller. BUT Garrow is not upset. There's even a twinkle in his eye when he tells Roran that he's happy for him.
Only Eragon is unhappy for Roran. He stops talking to his uncle and cousin and then wonders why there is a distance between him and Roran. There's really nothing more I can say to that.
In the mean time Eragon and Saphira bond. Paolini tells us that Saphira's personality "was eclectic and at times completely alien, yet they understood each other on a profound level". These are all very pretty words, but what do they mean exactly? It's all very vague and there are no examples of this to make it clearer. But it does sound profound doesn't it? Using the word profound usually indicates that there is a profoundness. But better would have been to show and not tell us that they have a deep profound understanding. (Though how you would do that, is up in the air. But it's not something you should just say.)
Garrow, on the morn of Roran's leaving, gives Roran and Eragon some advice. It sounds like the Sunscreen song but less amusing. I believe it's supposed to be good advice, but it sounds trite. He says things like, "...Let no one rule your mind or body. Take special care that your thoughts remain unfettered. One may be a free man yet be bound tighter than a slave. Give men your ear, but not your heart. Show respect for those in power, but don't follow them blindly. Judge with logic and reason, but comment not." (page 64). Very... trite, but it sounds good and wise, doesn't it? I doubt that Eragon will follow it. But it sounds good.
In town Eragon learns that two strangers are looking for his stone. They are, of course, very bad news. Hurst tells him to leave town and get rid of the stone. Eragon, instead, eavesdrops on Sloan talking to the Mysterious Strangers. He decides that he's going to punch Sloan the next time he sees him, because Sloan tells them about the stone. We don't know what Sloan is feeling or even if he's the only one who's told them. The mysterious strangers are definitely threatening. Sloan has no loyalty to Eragon, but he may feel that these strangers are a danger to his daughter. Sloan has no reason to be loyal to Eragon, yet Eragon feels that he should be silent. Sloan has been slated to be the enemy since we first met him. And this is why he's the enemy. So he can betray Eragon to the enemy. It couldn't be a good person who does it by accident, or one that was coerced because then they wouldn't be good. We need a bad person to do a bad thing. In this case betray Eragon to the bad guys. It would be more tense and dramatic if these mysterious strangers were to threaten or get a good person to betray Eragon by accident. Or even if Sloan were to not betray Eragon. But since Sloan is the bad guy he has to be the one who betrays Eragon.
The Mysterious Strangers notice Eragon and he freezes up. This is supposed to be strange and mysterious but instead it could just be explained as being scared witless. Brom rescues him and mugs off his mit to see the silvery mark on his hand. How does Brom know which hand has the mark, we really don't know. But we know that he was looking for the mark because he asked about the trader that Eragon said told him about dragon things. And Brom of course knows a bit too much about dragons than an ordinary storyteller should. And this is Stranger and Mysterious.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 06:49 am (UTC)Translation: Don't be gay. For the love of god DON'T BE GAY!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 06:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 07:19 am (UTC)I mean, first there's Roran, then Brom, then Murtagh...
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 07:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 07:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 08:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 02:29 pm (UTC)And the plot of Eragon is spectacularly wince-worthy so far.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 08:04 pm (UTC)Plot? What plot? I haven't seen any plot.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 12:11 am (UTC)It's worth the cringing for all the giggling caused through disbelief!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 10:42 pm (UTC)Earth Logic makes sense in that Sloan wouldn't take the stone for the meat because, what is he going to do with a rock? He can't eat it or spend it or do anything. He'd basically be giving the food away, which he can't afford to do.
Fan Girl logic says that Sloan should take the rock for the meat because it's shiny and valuable and Eragon's offering it to him. Never mind the fact that he couldn't do anything with it. He is therefor evil because he doesn't. And because he doesn't like Eragon, while everyone should like Eragon.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 10:35 pm (UTC)Yeah - to be honest, I have absolutely no idea why they bothered keeping the whole Brom-is-an-ex-dragon-rider thing quiet. I mean, I saw it coming a mile away, and I NEVER spot plot twists, even the ones everyone else usually spots a mile away. (I didn't spot that Murtagh is 99% certain to be Eragon's long-lost brother in the first reading, but I'm willing to bet he either has done in the second book or will do in the third.)
I did actually kinda like this book in the first reading, though I'm not sure why now. Even then, my ability to take it seriously was spoiled somewhat when I misread a line about "a dwarf polishing his war axe" as "a dwarf polishing his ear wax" and it took me half a page to realise that couldn't possibly be right.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 10:43 pm (UTC)The book has a certain quality about it that makes it seem like it's good on the surface but when you think about it, it just fails to work.
I love your icon.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 10:48 pm (UTC)I still say the book's not *too* bad for a fifteen-year-old's writing, but since he actually got worse with the second one ... and it only got published in the first place because his dad works for a publishing company or something, didn't it?
If I ever get round to writing my own novel, can you ruthlessly bitch it out with me so I don't end up writing a Paolini clone? I've been tossing the idea around for a couple of years but still have to come up with anything resembling a coherent plot. Any tips for writing something non-Eragonish?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 11:11 pm (UTC)Know your cliches and be aware of them .DON'T steal plots so deliberately. Make sure you build your world solidly, especially the magics. Magic always needs to have rules or else it's unbelievable. So far, Paolini hasn't given any rules to his magic or limits.
I dunno. That's what I can think of off the top of my head. But I'd be happy to read stuff.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 11:20 pm (UTC)All I've got so far is your bog-standard "smalltown kid leaves village", except mine is doing it because she's been framed for murder rather than to seek her fortune, and she goes to the big city and falls in with a street gang rather than wandering the Random Fantasy Land questing. I still don't know why the kid in the village was murdered, but I know it's got to be something to do with the guy in the city who turns out to be the villain. I don't want it to be "hunting for the Ancient Artefact" or "heroine turns out to have special powers and he came up with a ridiculously convoluted plan to get her to the city rather than simply asking her for help", or god forbid an ancient prophecy ... I told you I suck at plots. But I'm quite fond of some of the characters I've come up with.
Trouble is, there's plenty of sites where you can get help with prose or characters, but there really isn't anywhere you can go for help with plotting.
(Actually Paolini has given some very vague rules to the magic - "you can't bring people back from the dead", etc. But we just KNOW that Eragon's going to wind up breaking these rules because he's Special[TM], don't we?)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 11:37 pm (UTC)Best way to come up with a plot is to ask the characters, this just happened to you, now what do you do? You character, you said, is framed for murder. That's your starting point. What does she do next? Why does she do it? Who was the murderer? Was she framed intentionally? Talk to the villain, see what his motives are. Was it a random fluke that the girl got framed or something else.
You don't need the other stuff, if you don't want it.
(It doesn't look like Paolini has a very firm set of rules for his magic. Like for my own world I have two types of magic users, wizards and witches. Wizards can use elemental magic, while witches can use life magic. The two can't cross over. And I have long documentation on why this is and how the magic users came about and blah...)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 11:50 pm (UTC)Still trying to work out the villain properly. I really need a motive for them. Ah well. Will work on it some time.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-20 11:59 pm (UTC)Best way I've found to get motives out of people is to write little shorts with them.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 11:24 am (UTC)Your plot does sound interesting, though. I'm pretty sure there's been a few 'framed for murder' cases of protagonist past out there, but it depends on how spiffily you do it. Usually they throw in shovelfuls of angst to spice it, which, similarly, can be good or bad.
Whenever I give my two cents over the internet, I always feel so pompous...probably because of the way I sound. ¬¬ I can't help the fact that there's a stick up my ass! It's irremovable!
(Damn, now I am really tempted to read Eragon to see how bad it is. Will my eyeballs fall out of my head if I do?)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-21 06:37 am (UTC)Polonius? Is that you?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 09:00 pm (UTC)"...Let no one rule your mind or body. Take special care that your thoughts remain unfettered. One may be a free man yet be bound tighter than a slave. Give men your ear, but not your heart. Show respect for those in power, but don't follow them blindly. Judge with logic and reason, but comment not."
and think that it's Polonius' speech to Laertes.
Psh. For all we know, Sloan might just have found some people who are good at estimating the value of rare artifacts and is wondering if he should maybe have traded the egg for some meat. Or he's worried about what might happen to the village if the egg is dangerous.
Ah, but Galby/Brom was a dragon rider too, so he would know any quirks riders develop with their marked hands, possibly. Or maybe it's visible to the special 'rider sight' or something silly like that.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 08:47 pm (UTC)Eragorn Sporking
Date: 2007-02-05 08:52 pm (UTC)I Would you mind if I befriended you. I would give you a E cookie
Re: Eragorn Sporking
Date: 2007-02-05 08:54 pm (UTC)