Date: 2010-06-29 09:29 pm (UTC)
I'd put money on it being a retcon. You don't have to be a good writer to know that you don't go with an identical Big Reveal at the end of consecutive books, unless you're walking something back, all the while whistling a little nothing-to-see-here-folks tune. I can't think of another story in any media that does that identical reveal. It just doesn't make any sense from a story construction standpoint. If it were planned from the beginning it seems unlikely he'd have gone with the Morzan reveal first. Law of diminishing returns and all that.

As to WHY the retcon... I'm less convinced that it was a takethat. It might have been that but it's also possible that Paolini simply changed his mind, as with the atheism and vegetarianism filibusters. It's possible he just thought it would cooler, upon further reflection.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

February 2016

S M T W T F S
 123456
7891011 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 02:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios