Stupid people make my head hurt.
Nov. 26th, 2007 11:51 amToday's stupidity award goes to people who are suspending pre-schoolers and kindergartners for sexual harassment. From Newsweek (Nov. 26, 2007):
You know, in the 60s when a child wasn't affectionate, they said this was a serious problem. Now it's a serious problem when they are. I think the former is better than the later. How else are kids supposed to learn how to be appropriately affectionate when they aren't allowed to be at all?
---
Oh yes, I'm sort of back. I'd tell you what's up, but then you'd give me hugs and I'd have to sue you for Sexual Harassment. >:D
Four year old... was suspended last year for sexual harassment when a female aide reported that the child buried his face in her chest when she hugged him...
Blackwell is one of a number of parents whose kindergartners and first graders are being suspended, often for days at a time, for sexual misconduct based on behavior like hugging, poking and pinching classmates or school staff. In Ohio, 74 first graders were suspended for "unwelcome sexual conduct" last year, up from 52 in 2005. In Virginia, at least 13 kindergartners have been suspended in each of the last three years for "sexual touching"...
"A lot of people say,'well, it's just elementary-age kids.' But... our culture has a lot of vulgarity in it right now," says Jim Walsh, a Texas lawyer who trains school officals to spot sexual harassment among students. Administrators are "on guard, and understandably so."
You know, in the 60s when a child wasn't affectionate, they said this was a serious problem. Now it's a serious problem when they are. I think the former is better than the later. How else are kids supposed to learn how to be appropriately affectionate when they aren't allowed to be at all?
---
Oh yes, I'm sort of back. I'd tell you what's up, but then you'd give me hugs and I'd have to sue you for Sexual Harassment. >:D
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 09:04 pm (UTC)Of course, I've grown up to be very touch-issued, but I hardly think it stems from that.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 09:23 pm (UTC)It's still rather stupid, though. Now, if he'd been doing it a lot and the aide had been asking him to stop, that would be a somewhat different matter.
*hug* Bring it on!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 09:45 pm (UTC)Welcome back.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 09:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 10:10 pm (UTC)And wait, it says she hugged him. Is she just not familiar with the face that kids that age are the right height for chest-face contact to occur pretty much whether either party wants it to or not? And anyway, I'd see that sort of behavior more as a response to a mom-figure than anything else. Still not totally appropriate for the setting, but hardly "vulgar."
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 10:11 pm (UTC)Now, my sister when we were in elementary school, had some boys going around grabbing the tits of the other girls. The school let that slide by saying, "Boys will be boys." So our dad gave her permission to act if they try it on her.
She ended up knocking one of them out for touching her.
And she got suspended.
That I think qualifies more as sexual harassment then "OMG LET ME HUG U!!1!"
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 12:21 am (UTC)I was a bit over-affectionate in elementary school, I think. I used to kiss the school secretaries. I think they eventually got reprimanded, because one day they started insisting that I not do it anymore.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 01:44 am (UTC)They're making it impossible for little kids to grow up normally. They're making them all sanitary and PC. Which'll cause more problems in the long term.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 01:47 am (UTC)From the article, it didn't sound like it. The dad was just as confused about it.
I think vulgar should only count if you're old enough to know what it means.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 01:48 am (UTC)Your dad was, in my opinion, acting appropriately. Though while I think your sister did something totally awesome... perhaps it was a bit too much.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 02:02 am (UTC)And PC doesn't work. Kids work themselves out right in time...IF you let them.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:06 am (UTC)It probably was a bit much, but my sister has always been pretty brute and tomboyish. And because the school was doing jack shit about it, she had to handle it her own way. The sad part is, is that my dad's girlfriend told me way worse stories about when her daughter went to school. Just...my god.... But that's an entirely other story on how retarded the school system is.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-27 09:18 am (UTC)And yes, as others have said, the kids don't even understand what's going on. Suspending them isn't going to do any good if they can't comprehend what they're supposed to have done wrong.
Heck, from at least the age of 5, maybe younger, I had a fixation on tying up girls... and it was YEARS before I understood there was anything sexual about it. I was a teenager before I even understood what sex was...
Sheesh.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 03:33 am (UTC)Huh. Same here.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-28 05:07 am (UTC)